![]() That said, it nails the Spider-Man scenes which should entertain most. A lack of answers surrounding the big mystery paired with a slow-moving plot makes this issue feel like catch-up to something that’s still very unclear. Due to a planned power outage on Friday, 1/14, between 8am-1pm PST, some services may be impacted. Given the state of Peter’s attitude, it suits the book.Īmazing Spider-Man is seemingly still trying to figure out what it wants to be, so your mileage may vary. version 1.2.8d OS Version: Android 4+Package name: .GloftASHM How to install The Amazing Spider-Man 2Cache for the game New. A glance at how Spider-Man’s costume is a darker red, blue, and usually mixed in with lots of blacks helps convey that. It may not be immediately obvious, but this story arc is darker in tone. Scott Hanna supplies inks on this issue too, capturing nice details in Peter’s hair or every line in Tombstone’s face. ![]() Marcio Menyz aids in that with good lighting. continues to impress in his classic style with a blocky look that gives everything a thick feel. The story goes back to basics which makes it easier to follow, but it’s also not doing quite enough to make us care about Tombstone or Peter’s dilemma. It doesn’t help the plot is moving slowly, with each issue taking place over one day. The massive mystery gets absolutely no development here, which is frustrating. Spider-Man is suited up far more in this issue than the last, but don’t expect a lot of plot progression in the suit either. Wells understands this aspect of Spider-Man and it works. In other words, it seems as though Woodley's Mary Jane never showed up on Peter's doorstep informing him that he had "hit the jackpot" - at least not yet.Peter is definitely still silly when it comes to banter with villains. In that film, Garfield's Peter tells his fellow Spider-Men of the night Gwen Stacy died, describing her as "my MJ." Shortly thereafter, Garfield's Peter confides in Tobey Maguire's version of the character that he doesn't have a significant other in his life, implying that he has yet to move on from Gwen. After all, Andrew Garfield's version of Peter Parker recently made his triumphant return in Marvel Studios' Spider-Man: No Way Home. Still, the canonicity of MJ's involvement in the Amazing Spider-Man universe remains questionable at best. In all likelihood, the filmmakers saw no reason to cut a perfectly good shot, since fans weren't supposed to know that was MJ. While she's never named and her face is never visible, it looks like Mary Jane is technically in the movie, though Woodley remains uncredited. In short, that little tidbit on Wikipedia actually appears accurate. In these photos, Woodley is seen sporting a button-up denim shirt with her red hair braided. More relevant to the topic at hand, one particular batch of set photos suggests that The Amazing Spider-Man 2 would have involved Mary Jane working at a coffee shop. These leaks suggest numerous scenes involving MJ, including an encounter with Peter, as well as a separate encounter with Gwen. While the deleted scenes featuring Woodley as Mary Jane were never officially released to the public, various photos and videos of Woodley on the film's set have surfaced online over the years. Similar claims are made on other websites, including, Comic Vine and the Spider-Man Films Wiki. That said, the Wikipedia page for The Amazing Spider-Man 2 once had an interesting factoid: " can be briefly seen from the back during Rhino's attack at the end of the film." However, this claim was labeled with "citation needed" before eventually being removed from the article, warranting further investigation. Webb cited wanting to keep the focus on Peter Parker (Andrew Garfield) and Gwen Stacy's (Emma Stone) relationship as the reason for MJ's absence. Sure enough, despite Woodley having filmed scenes as the character, Spidey's best-known love interest was nowhere to be seen when the film hit theaters the following year. In mid-2013, however, it came to light that MJ had been cut from The Amazing Spider-Man 2 entirely. Apparently, the plan was for Woodley's MJ to play a minor role in The Amazing Spider-Man 2 before taking on a significantly larger role in The Amazing Spider-Man 3, the latter of which was never made. However, a blink-and-you'll-miss-it moment from the film's closing minutes seems to suggest that Woodley's MJ may have just barely made it into the final cut after all.Īs the story goes, Woodley was cast to portray Mary Jane in director Marc Webb's Amazing Spider-Man sequel in late 2012. ![]() While Shailene Woodley was cast to play Mary Jane "MJ" Watson in 2014's The Amazing Spider-Man 2, the decision was ultimately made to omit the character from the movie.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |